MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884916450 · doi:10.15252/embj.201899372

Small molecule inhibitors reveal an indispensable scaffolding role of RIPK2 in NOD2 signaling

2018· article· en· W2884916450 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matouš Hrdinka, Lisa Schlicher, Bing Dai, Daniel M. Pinkas, Joshua C. Bufton, S. Picaud, Jennifer Ward, Catherine A. Rogers, Chalada Suebsuwong, Sameer Nikhar, Gregory D. Cuny, K. Huber, P. Filippakopoulos, Alex N. Bullock, Alexei Degterev, Mads Gyrd‐Hansen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe EMBO Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesAllergopharmaNational Institutes of HealthForskerakademietOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationGrantová Agentura České RepublikyLudwig Institute for Cancer ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationGenome CanadaDiamond Light SourceEuropean Molecular Biology OrganizationMyeloma UKWellcome TrustMerck KGaAMinisterstvo Vnitra České RepublikyFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsNovartis PharmaAbbVieTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyMedical Research CouncilMeso Scale DiagnosticsDanmarks Frie ForskningsfondEshelman Institute for Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillAmerican Heart AssociationMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoNational Cancer InstituteBayerBoehringer IngelheimErzincan ÜniversitesiPfizer
KeywordsLibrary scienceMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RIPK2 mediates inflammatory signaling by the bacteria-sensing receptors NOD1 and NOD2. Kinase inhibitors targeting RIPK2 are a proposed strategy to ameliorate NOD-mediated pathologies. Here, we reveal that RIPK2 kinase activity is dispensable for NOD2 inflammatory signaling and show that RIPK2 inhibitors function instead by antagonizing XIAP-binding and XIAP-mediated ubiquitination of RIPK2. We map the XIAP binding site on RIPK2 to the loop between b2 and b3 of the N-lobe of the kinase, which is in close proximity to the ATP-binding pocket. Through characterization of a new series of ATP pocket-binding RIPK2 inhibitors, we identify the molecular features that determine their inhibition of both the RIPK2-XIAP interaction, and of cellular and in vivo NOD2 signaling. Our study exemplifies how targeting of the ATP-binding pocket in RIPK2 can be exploited to interfere with the RIPK2-XIAP interaction for modulation of NOD signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe EMBO JournalSame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207