Novel <i>SBF2</i> mutations and clinical spectrum of Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth neuropathy type 4B2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biallelic SBF2 mutations cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4B2 (CMT4B2), a sensorimotor neuropathy with autosomal recessive inheritance and association with glaucoma. Since the discovery of the gene mutation, only few additional patients have been reported. We identified seven CMT4B2 families with nine different SBF2 mutations. Revisiting genetic and clinical data from our cohort and the literature, SBF2 variants were private mutations, including exon-deletion and de novo variants. The neuropathy typically started in the first decade after normal early motor development, was predominantly motor and had a rather moderate course. Electrophysiology and nerve biopsies indicated demyelination and excess myelin outfoldings constituted a characteristic feature. While neuropathy was >90% penetrant at age 10 years, glaucoma was absent in ~40% of cases but sometimes developed with age. Consequently, SBF2 mutation analysis should not be restricted to individuals with coincident neuropathy and glaucoma, and CMT4B2 patients without glaucoma should be followed for increased intraocular pressure. The presence of exon-deletion and de novo mutations demands comprehensive mutation scanning and family studies to ensure appropriate diagnostic approaches and genetic counseling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".