MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2885044386 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-2269

Abstract 2269: Transcription factor relationships associated with androgen-deprivation therapy response and metastatic progression in prostate cancer

2018· article· en· W2885044386 on OpenAlexaff
Nitya V. Sharma, Kathryn L. Pellegrini, Véronique Ouellet, Felipe Giuste, S.S. Ramalingam, Kenneth A. Watanabe, Éloïse Adam-Granger, Lucresse Fossouo, Sungyong You, Michael R. Freeman, Paula M. Vertino, Karen N. Conneely, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Dominique Trudel, Anne‐Marie Mes‐Masson, John A. Petros, Fred Saad, Carlos S. Moreno

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrogen deprivation therapyProstate cancerJUNBAndrogen receptorTranscription factorCancer researchMedicineEnzalutamideOncologyMetastasisBiologyCancerInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Patients with recurrent, aggressive prostate cancer typically undergo androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), but the benefits are often short-lived, and responses are variable. Failure to respond to ADT invariably leads to metastatic disease, and ultimately death. To investigate differential responses to ADT, we performed whole-transcriptome analysis of 20 patient-matched pre-ADT biopsies and post-ADT prostatectomy specimens, and observed that all patients lost transcriptional signatures indicative of the androgen receptor (AR)-dependent subtype, after treatment. We also identified two subgroups of patients with either a strong or weak transcriptional response to ADT. The strong responders maintained the more aggressive subtype signal, while the weak responders lost expression of these genes and more resembled an AR-suppressed, basal subtype. We generated a strong responder transcriptional network using the PANDA program and integrated expression data from our cohort, protein-protein interaction, and DNA binding motif data. We also leveraged the expression data from a large public dataset of over 800 metastatic and primary samples to construct a metastatic lesion transcriptional network. We identified 20 common transcription factor coordinated groups (TFCGs) associated with both the strong responders and metastatic lesions, including GLI3/GLI2, SOX4/FOXA2/GATA4, ERF/ETV5/ETV3/ELF4, and a TFCG containing JUN, JUNB, JUND, FOS, FOSB, and FOSL1. Many TFCGs in the metastatic network were subsets of larger groups in the strong responders network, implicating these transcription factor associations as potentially critical for both the differential ADT response and metastatic disease progression. Citation Format: Nitya V. Sharma, Kathryn L. Pellegrini, Veronique Ouellet, Felipe O. Giuste, Selvi Ramalingam, Kenneth Watanabe, Eloise Adam-Granger, Lucresse Fossouo, Sungyong You, Michael R. Freeman, Paula Vertino, Karen Conneely, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Dominique Trudel, Anne-Marie Mes-Masson, John A. Petros, Fred Saad, Carlos S. Moreno. Transcription factor relationships associated with androgen-deprivation therapy response and metastatic progression in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2269.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→