Conservation of kinase-phosphorylation site pairings: Evidence for an evolutionarily dynamic phosphoproteome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kinase-mediated protein phosphorylation is a central mechanism for regulation of cellular responses and phenotypes. While considerable information is available regarding the evolutionary relationships within the kinase family, as well as the evolutionary conservation of phosphorylation sites, each aspect of this partnership is typically considered in isolation, despite their clear functional relationship. Here, to offer a more holistic perspective on the evolution of protein phosphorylation, the conservation of protein phosphorylation sites is considered in the context of the conservation of the corresponding modifying kinases. Specifically, conservation of defined kinase-phosphorylation site pairings (KPSPs), as well as of each of the component parts (the kinase and the phosphorylation site), were examined across a range of species. As expected, greater evolutionary distance between species was generally associated with lower probability of KPSP conservation, and only a small fraction of KPSPs were maintained across all species, with the vast majority of KPSP losses due to the absence of the phosphorylation site. This supports a model in which a relatively stable kinome promotes the emergence of functional substrates from an evolutionarily malleable phosphoproteome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".