MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885138738 · doi:10.21037/atm.2018.07.04

ABCA7 genotype altered Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer’s disease without dementia

2018· article· en· W2885138738 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fangchen Ma, Yu Zong, Hui-Fu Wang, Jieqiong Li, Xi‐Peng Cao, Lan Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Translational Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringQingdao Key Health Discipline Development FundCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEisaiGenentechIXICONorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerBiogenBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaEli Lilly and CompanyU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBristol-Myers SquibbAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidDementiaGenotypeMedicineDiseaseAlzheimer's diseasePathologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: ATP-binding cassette transporter A7 (ABCA7) rs3764650 has been identified to be a susceptibility locus for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its role in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins was still unclear. METHODS: , t-tau and p-tau were analyzed in non-dementia AD, including preclinical and prodromal AD from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. RESULTS: level, but did not alter CSF t-tau and p-tau levels in non-dementia AD at baseline, which was further confirmed in longitudinal studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings supported that ABCA7 modified AD risk by altering Aβ deposition rather than tau pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Translational MedicineSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207