A Volumetric Fusing Method for TLS and SFM Point Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point cloud acquired from a given ground view is incomplete because of severe occlusion and self-occlusion. The models reconstructed by aligning the cross-source point clouds [TLS and structure-from-motion (SFM) point clouds] provide a more complete large-scale outdoor scene. However, because of differences in nonrigid deformation, stratified redundancy of alignment is inevitable and ubiquitous. Therefore, this paper presents a volumetric fusing method for cross-source three-dimensional reconstructions. To eliminate the stratification of aligned cross-source point clouds, we propose a graph-cuts method with boundary constraints for blending the two cross-source point clouds. Then, to reduce the gaps that exist in the blending results, we develop a progressive migration method combined with the local average direction of normal vectors to smooth the unconnected boundary. Finally, experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of eliminating stratification with the proposed blending algorithm, and the progressive migration method achieves a smooth connection in the boundary of the blended point clouds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".