La communication responsable : une approche dialogique constitutive des organisations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article opère une distinction entre trois types de responsabilités que sont la responsabilité rétrospective, prospective et active. La responsabilité active compense le manque de réflexion éthique dans l’espace entre la rétrospection et la prospection ; elle fait référence à cette communication qui se passe entre le passé et le futur, c’est-à-dire à ce qui se trame dans le présent, avant l’émission formelle du message. Cet article propose de distinguer également la communication de la responsabilité de la communication responsable. La communication de la responsabilité s’appuie sur la communication conçue comme transmission pour argumenter et justifier le bien-fondé d’une position au détriment des autres. La communication responsable embraye sur la communication dialogique, constitutive des organisations. Vue sous l’angle de la communication constitutive de l’organisation, la communication responsable est une communication dialogique qui rend possible l’inclusion des acteurs et des parties prenantes là où la responsabilité rétrospective et prospective avaient tendance à exclure et à stigmatiser ces exclus. Cet article conclut en proposant une procédure de communication éthique à l’usage des organisations. This contribution operates a distinction between three types of responsibilities, namely retrospective, prospective and active responsibility. The active responsibility tackles the ethical vacuum between the prospective and the retrospective ; it refers to the communication happening between the past and the future, that is to say the communication happening in the present, before the formal issuance of the message. This article proposes to distinguish the communication of responsibility from the notion of responsible communication. The communication of the responsibility based on communication conceived as transmission allows actors to argue and justify the merits of a position to the detriment of others. Responsible Communication on the other hand engages the dialogic communication, constitutive of organizations. Viewed from the constitutive communication perspective, responsible communication is a dialogic communication that makes possible the inclusion of actors and stakeholders that retrospective and prospective responsibilities tended to exclude and to stigmatize. This article concludes with by proposing a procedure able to sustain ethical communication in organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".