Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis l'implantation des premieres ecoles federales au milieu du siecle dernier, le systeme d'education au Nunavik n'a cesse d'etre en crise. Absenteisme frequent, faibles resultats scolaires, decrochage important des eleves au secondaire? le portrait est, helas, familier. L'ecole echoue par ailleurs a enseigner adequatement la culture inuite, ce qui attise les critiques a son egard. Prenant appui sur son experience personnelle a titre de suppleant dans le village de Kangirsuk, Nicolas Bertrand dresse le portrait de cette ecole dont la derive a des racines profondes et complexes. Il reflechit aussi a la maniere de reformer ce systeme et demontre la difficulte de cette entreprise. Car tant et aussi longtemps que l'ecole sera percue par les Inuits, a tort ou a raison, comme un obstacle et non comme une condition de leur emancipation, sa legitimite sera contestee et sa mission, compromise. De l'education de sa jeunesse depend pourtant l'avenir du Nunavik qui, sans renier son passe, doit aussi accepter pleinement sa modernite. Nicolas Bertrand s'envole pour Kangirsuk au moment ou parait Deja, son premier roman (Hamac, 2010). Jusqu'en 2012, il sejourne dans ce village du Nunavik ou il est, l'espace de quelques mois, suppleant au primaire et au secondaire. Depuis son retour dans le sud du pays, il enseigne la philosophie au College Montmorency a Laval.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".