MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18796: Characterization of Endothelial Colony-forming Cells Bioactivity in Young Adults Born Extremely Preterm Versus Term

2015· article· en· W2885271500 on OpenAlexaff
Mariane Bertagnolli, Katryn Paquette, Megan R. Sutherland, Chanel Béland, Marie‐Amélie Lukaszewski, Anik Cloutier, Bernard Thébaud, Thuy Mai Luu, Anne Monique Nuyt

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrologyCD31MedicineProgenitor cellMatrigelCD34Peripheral blood mononuclear cellCord bloodAngiogenesisEndothelial progenitor cellIn vitroImmunologyStem cellInternal medicineBiologyCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Among subtypes of endothelial progenitor cells, endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFC) display high proliferative and angiogenic capacity in vitro and are considered biomarkers of angiogenic/regenerative capacity. Cord blood ECFC from preterm born (PT) infants have impaired bioactivity, especially in those who develop prematurity-related complications such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Whether ECFC dysfunction persists in PT beyond the neonatal period is not known. Objective: Our aim was to assess ECFC bioactivity (in vitro growth, angiogenic capacity) in extremely PT vs. term (T) born young adults. Methods: ECFC were obtained from peripheral blood from 19 young adults (21-28 years old) born extremely PT (<29 weeks gestation) and 19 T (≥37 weeks, paired by gender, age and socioeconomic status). Mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated by density gradient and plated (5x10(6) cells/flask) to allow ECFC colony formation. ECFC were cultured to assess cell phenotype (CD45-/CD34+/CD31+/KDR+), in vitro proliferation rate by modified thymidine analogue EdU incorporation, and tubular formation in Matrigel. Results: ECFC colonies were obtained from 9 PT (48%) and 12 T (63%). The frequency distribution of the number of days to first colony formation was significantly different in PT vs. T, with higher frequency of late (> 15 days) and absence of any colony formation in PT (p=0.033). In PT, days to form 1st ECFC colony inversely correlated with ECFC proliferation rate (r=-0.85, p<0.001), and angiogenic capacity shown as number of tubes (r=-0.72, p=0.037) and branches (r=-0.68, p=0.043) formed in Matrigel, whereas in T these correlations were not significant with similar ECFC function at any time of colony formation. In PT, tubular formation negatively correlated with neonatal length of hospital stay (r=-0.72, p=0.03), a proxy of prematurity-related complications. Conclusions: Time to first ECFC colony formation, proliferation rate and in vitro tubular formation are significantly altered in PT vs. T young adults. Overall data suggests that extremely PT born young adults display impaired ECFC bioactivity, which may contribute to the development of cardiovascular diseases associated with impaired angiogenesis in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→