Abstract 1134: The tumor suppressor activity of miR-300 is detrimental for leukemia development but required for leukemia stem cell maintenance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) tumor suppressor is essential for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) stem cell (LSC) maintenance and disease development. Persistence of drug-resistant quiescent LSCs depends on cell-autonomous and bone marrow (BM) signals. Herein, we identified miR-300 as an miRNA inhibited in CD34+ CML progenitors and during blastic transformation (BC) through the BCR-ABL1-dependent inhibition of C/EBPβ-induced miR-300 transcription. In CML progenitors, ectopic mir-300 expression directly targets the PP2A inhibitory pathway (i.e., Jak2, hnRNPA1, SET) and other factors essential for LSC maintenance and disease progression (e.g., CCND1/2, b-catenin, Myc, Twist-1). In leukemic but not normal CD34+ cells, miR-300 acts as a potent tumor suppressor by inducing cell cycle exit and promoting apoptosis. Conversely, hypoxia-induced BCR-ABL1 inhibition and induction of C/EBPβ were found essential for increased miR-300 levels in quiescent LSCs, although mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC)-derived exosomal miR-300 also contributed to it. Moreover, low O2 levels and MSC-derived exosomes induced quiescence of CD34+ CML cells. Notably, expression of an anti-miR-300 in MSCs prevented exosome-induced CD34+ CML growth arrest. LSCs escaped miR-300-induced apoptosis through the autocrine/paracrine TGFβ1-induced expression of TUG1, a lncRNA acting as an miR-300 sponge. In fact, TUG1 or TGFβ1 inhibition decreased quiescent (CFSEMAX) LSC number. By contrast, miR-300 inhibition did not alter LSC survival/self-renewal, further supporting a role for TUG1 as an miR-300 sponge. Accordingly, TUG1 was markedly induced in CFSEMAX but not dividing CD34+ CML cells. In fact, low levels of ectopic miR-300 induced growth arrest (decreased LTC-IC and CFC/replating activity) without affecting quiescent LSC number. By contrast, high doses of miR-300 but not scramble CpG-ODN impaired LSC survival (LTC-IC) and self-renewal (CFC/replating), induced marked killing of quiescent LSCs and dividing progenitors, and impaired CML engraftment in NRG-SGM3 mice. Such effects were further enhanced when CPG-miR-300 and CPG-anti-TUG1 were combined. By contrast, high CpG-miR-300 levels did not affect normal CD34+ cell survival/self-renewal likely because of high TUG1 expression. Altogether our results indicate that while miR-300 loss is essential for survival/proliferation of leukemic progenitors, increased miR-300 levels are required for LSC maintenance. Thus, induction of TUG1 may occur to preserve LSC survival in the BM endosteal niche where quiescence is induced by MSCs and low O2 levels through abnormal miR-300 induction. Thus, disrupting the miR-300/TUG1 balance may represent a potential therapeutic approach for treatment/eradication of LSC-derived leukemias. This work is supported in part by NIH-NCI R01CA163800. Citation Format: Giovannino Silvestri, Lorenzo Stramucci, Justin Ellis, Jason Harb, Paolo Neviani, Bin Zhang, Klara Srutova, Gabriel Pineda, Catriona Jamieson, Bruno Calabretta, Fabio Stagno, Paolo Vigneri, Georgios Nteliopoulos, Philippa May, Alistar Reid, Ramiro Garzon, Denis-Claude Roy, Martin Guimond, Peter Hokland, Michael Deininger, Garrett Fitzgerald, Chris Harman, Francesco Dazzi, Dragana Milojkovic, Jane Apperley, Guido Marcucci, Jianfei Qi, Katerina Machova-Polakova, Xiaoxuan Fan, Maria Baer, Rossana Trotta, Danilo Perrotti. The tumor suppressor activity of miR-300 is detrimental for leukemia development but required for leukemia stem cell maintenance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1134.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".