Virulence of <i>Flavobacterium psychrophilum</i> isolates in rainbow trout <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i> (Walbaum)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Flavobacterium psychrophilum, the causative agent of bacterial cold‐water disease (BCWD) in freshwater‐reared salmonids, is also a common commensal organism of healthy fish. The virulence potential of F. psychrophilum isolates obtained from BCWD cases in Ontario between 1994 and 2009 was evaluated. In preliminary infection trials of rainbow trout juveniles, significant differences (0% to 63% mortality) in the virulence of the 22 isolates tested were noted following intraperitoneal injection with 10 8 cfu/fish. A highly virulent strain, FPG 101, was selected for further study. When fish were injected intraperitoneally with a 10 6 , 10 7 or 10 8 cfu/fish of F. psychrophilum FPG 101, the 10 8 cfu/fish dose produced significantly greater mortality ( p < 0.05). The bacterial load in spleen samples collected from fish every 3 days after infection was determined using rpoC quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification and by plate counting. Bacterial culture and rpoC qPCR were highly correlated ( R 2 = 0.92); however, culture was more sensitive than the qPCR assay for the detection of F. psychrophilum in spleen tissue. Ninety‐seven per cent of the asymptomatic and the morbid fish had splenic bacterial loads of <2.8 log 10 gene/copies and >3.0 log 10 gene copies/reaction, respectively, following infection with 10 8 cfu/fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".