MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885371123 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3420

The fast, luminous ultraviolet transient AT2018cow: extreme supernova, or disruption of a star by an intermediate-mass black hole?

2018· article· en· W2885371123 on OpenAlexfundno aff
D. A. Perley, P. A. Mazzali, Lin Yan, S. B. Cenko, Suvi Gezari, K. Taggart, C. Fremling, Brenna Mockler, Avinash Singh, Nozomu Tominaga, Masaomi Tanaka, A. M. Watson, Tomás Ahumada, G. C. Anupama, C. Ashall, R. L. Becerra, D. Bersier, V. Bhalerao, J. S. Bloom, N. Butler, C. M. Copperwheat, M. W. Coughlin, Kishalay De, A. J. Drake, Dmitry A. Duev, Sara Frederick, J. González‐Hernández, A. Goobar, Marianne Heida, Anna Y. Q. Ho, J. Chuck Horst, T. Hung, R. Itoh, J. Jencson, M. M. Kasliwal, N. Kawai, Tanazza Khanam, S. R. Kulkarni, Brajesh Kumar, Harsh Kumar, A. Kutyrev, William H. Lee, Keiichi Maeda, A. Mahabal, Katsuhiro L. Murata, James D. Neill, Chow‐Choong Ngeow, Bryan E. Penprase, E. Pian, R. Quimby, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, M. G. Richer, C. Román-Zúñiga, D. K. Sahu, Shubham Srivastav, Q. Socia, J. Sollerman, Y. Tachibana, F. Taddia, Samaporn Tinyanont, E. Troja, Charlotte Ward, Jerrick Wee, Po‐Chieh Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of TokyoJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemStockholms UniversitetNational Central UniversityTokyo Institute of TechnologyMax-Planck-GesellschaftScience and Engineering Research BoardNational Science FoundationLiverpool John Moores UniversityQueen's UniversityWeizmann Institute of SciencePomona CollegeIndian Space Research OrganisationSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationHenry Moore FoundationLos Alamos National LaboratoryAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityIndo-US Science and Technology ForumGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastMinistry of Science and TechnologySan Diego State UniversityKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseDurham UniversityVetenskapsrådetSmithsonian InstitutionU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSupernovaRedshiftAstronomyPopulationPhotometry (optics)Black hole (networking)GalaxyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wide-field optical surveys have begun to uncover large samples of fast (t_rise < 5d), luminous (M_peak < -18), blue transients. While commonly attributed to the breakout of a supernova shock into a dense wind, the great distances to the transients of this class found so far have hampered a detailed investigation of their properties until now. We present photometry and spectroscopy from a comprehensive worldwide campaign to observe AT2018cow (ATLAS18qqn), the first fast-luminous optical transient to be found in real time at low redshift. Our first spectra (<2 days after discovery) are entirely featureless. A very broad absorption feature suggestive of near-relativistic velocities develops between 3-8 days, then disappears. Broad emission features of H and He develop after >10 days. The spectrum remains extremely hot throughout its evolution, and the photospheric radius contracts with time (receding below R<10^14 cm after 1 month). This behavior does not match that of any known supernova, although a relativistic jet within a fallback supernova could explain some of the observed features. Alternatively, the transient could originate from the disruption of a star by an intermediate-mass black hole, although this would require long-lasting emission of highly super-Eddington thermal radiation. In either case, AT 2018cow suggests that the population of fast luminous transients represents a new class of astrophysical event. Intensive follow-up of this event in its late phases, and of any future events found at comparable distance, will be essential to better constrain their origins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations226
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207