MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 9635: Percutaneous vs. Surgical Pulmonary Valve Implantation: How Does the Right Ventricle Fare?

2012· article· en· W2885377902 on OpenAlexaff
Karima Addetia, Giuseppe Martucci, Adrian Dancea, Ariane Marelli, Judith Therrien

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentriclePercutaneousCardiologyInternal medicinePulmonary valveRight heartSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) to non-invasively correct pulmonary valve dysfunction is a recent advancement. Cardiopulmonary bypass is known to have a negative impact on right ventricular (RV) function. This study was designed to assess RV recovery using echocardiographic parameters post surgical pulmonary graft placement versus PPVI. Methods. Retrospective study of consecutive adult patients who underwent PPVI and received graft bioprosthesis between 2007 and 2011. Echocardiographic parameters analyzed included tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV tissue Doppler velocity (TDV), and myocardial performance index (MPI). Graphs of relative differences (between postoperative and preoperative values) for each parameter were constructed to compare preoperative, early (≤60 days) and late postoperative (≥6-12 months) measurements. Significance of results was determined using T-test. Results. Ten patients received PPVI and 26 underwent open heart surgery with graft insertion. Average patient age was 31±20 years. Pre-operative TDV (p=0.008), and MPI (p=0.05) were significantly higher for the surgical population than the percutaneous group. Postoperative, TDV and TAPSE were significantly lower early (p<0.001) and late (p<0.001) in the surgical group than preoperative measures. No significant differences were seen for the PPVI group. On comparison of relative differences in parameters between groups TDI was significantly higher both early (p<0.001) and late (p<0.006) postoperatively in the percutaneous group. Conclusion. RV systolic recovery as measured by TDV and TAPSE was significantly impaired post surgery but relatively unchanged post PPVI. On analysis of relative differences in RV parameters, TDI was significantly higher early and late post PPVI than open-heart surgery suggesting that surgery may impact RV function more significantly than its percutaneous counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→