DIONNE BRAND E SANDRO ORNELLAS: UM ENCONTRO NA CASA DA REEXISTÊNCIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The work presented here intends to bring the writer Dione Brand and the poet and teacher Sandro Ornellas closer to the aspect of reexistence, seeking to answer the question: how is reexistence present in the work of these authors? Dione Brand, a Caribbean-Canadian author, Toronto's third poet laureate, has produced a play about black women in the contemporary city that deserves attention. Both her poetry and her prose deal with the issues of black and post-colonial feminism in a strong, vibrant and contemporary way. Sandro Ornellas, professor of the Portuguese literature sector of the Federal University of Bahia, poet, brings a writing based on the drifts of subjectivity and the fatality of the body. The reexistence in Sandro Ornellas resides, first hand, not based directly on the issues tangent to ethnic-racial debates, gender or sexuality, but nevertheless, in the demands that pass through the field of solitude of the contemporary subject in front of the culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".