MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2885421631 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11768

"A war for a foreign woman" Gender, Power and Economic Tension in Negril

2017· dissertation· en· W2885421631 on OpenAlexaff
Kayleigh Thompson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationPower (physics)Gender studiesOrder (exchange)TourismReading (process)Gender relationsPsychologyPolitical scienceSociologySocial psychologyEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the intimate relationships between white foreign women and black Jamaican men in Negril, a transnational tourist town located on the western tip of Jamaica.Within the contexts of Negril, relationships between white foreign women and black Jamaican men are commonly considered suspect and ambiguous based on the frequency at which relationships shrouded in economic and intimate exchanges take place.Some female sex tourism scholars recognize foreign women as exerting their racial and economic power over local black men in the destination towns they visit, whereas other scholars suggest that local men exert their gender power over foreign women in their relationships.Upon closer examination of the everyday complex negotiations of power that take place within relationships between foreign women and Jamaican men in Negril, it became clear that the power that operates within the relationships is not straightforward.Both foreign women and Jamaican men exercise different forms of power in order to get what it is that they desire from their relationships.This complicates common misconceptions of foreign women as either wealthy and all powerful or as naïve victims of sexually aggressive Jamaican men, and calls for a more nuanced reading of the negotiations of power in the local contexts of Negril.Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………… ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………….iii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………… iv List of Appendices…………………………………………………………………………... v Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaribbean history, culture, and politics→French-language works237,207→