Gold-tip versus Contact-Sensed Catheter for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation: A Comparative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a highly successful procedure for the management of typical atrial flutter (AFL), an abnormal heart rhythm originating within the atria. There is no strong evidence that the use of contact force (CF) has any impact on procedural duration or acute success in the management of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL. The aim of this study was to compare acute procedural parameters using a non-CF, 4-mm, gold-tip, irrigated catheter and a CF-sensing catheter in patients with AFL. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent typical AFL catheter ablation with either a gold-tip or CF-sensing catheter were enrolled. The procedural parameters obtained were: time to achieve bidirectional block, time to terminate AFL, total duration of RF application, procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, acute reconnection within 20 minutes following the last RF application, and procedural complications. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients screened, 37 were included in the study. The procedural endpoint of bidirectional isthmus block was achieved in all patients. The use of gold-tip catheters was associated with a shorter length of time to achieve bidirectional block (median time: 20.0 minutes [interquartile range {IQR}: 12.0-28.0 minutes]) compared with a median time of 36.0 minutes (IQR: 12.0-53.0 minutes; p=0.048) in the CF group. Furthermore, there was a trend toward reduced procedural duration in favor of the gold-tip catheter (median goldtip: 74.0 minutes [IQR: 57.0-84.0 minutes]; median CF: 85.0 minutes [IQR: 57.0-107.0 minutes]; p=0.171). A greater requirement for the use of long sheaths was observed in cases where the CF catheter was employed for the procedure (CF: 11, 57.9 %; non-CF: 1, 5.6%; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The time required to achieve bidirectional block, which is also reflected in the procedural time, was less when using a gold-tip catheter, and there was less need for the use of a long sheath. Further studies may be useful to evaluate this finding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".