Cardiac branched-chain amino acid oxidation is reduced during insulin resistance in the heart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have proposed that elevated branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) may induce insulin resistance (IR) in muscle secondary to increased BCAA oxidation inhibiting glucose oxidation (GO) and fatty acid oxidation (FAO). However, BCAA oxidation rates have not been assessed in muscle IR, and cardiac FAO rates are actually already elevated in obesity-associated IR. We therefore directly examined cardiac BCAA oxidation in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) to induce insulin resistance to better understand the role of cardiac BCAA oxidation in cardiac IR. BCAA oxidation, GO, FAO, and glycolysis were measured in isolated working hearts from mice fed either a low-fat diet (LFD) or HFD for 10 wk. Insulin stimulation of cardiac GO and inhibition of FAO were blunted in HFD mice, resulting in a marked increase in FAO contribution to ATP production compared with LFD mice hearts (71.2% vs. 37.1%, respectively). Surprisingly, cardiac BCAA oxidation rate was reduced in HFD compared with LFD mice (33.5 ± 3.4 vs. 56.7 ± 7.1 nmol·min -1 ·g dry wt −1 , respectively, P < 0.05, n = 9/group). In addition, BCAA oxidation contributed ~1% of the ATP production of the heart, and, as a result, alterations in BCAA oxidation could not significantly impact either GO or FAO rates. However, the decrease in BCAA oxidation was accompanied by an increase in BCAA concentration and impaired insulin signaling. These results suggest that cardiac IR is not due to an increase in BCAA oxidation and subsequent inhibition of GO and FAO. Rather, we propose that an inhibition of BCAA oxidation rate contributes to IR by leading to increased BCAA concentration, which negatively impacts insulin signaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".