Dwarf mistletoe infection in jack pine alters growth–defense relationships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trees utilize a combination of chemical and anatomical defenses against a myriad of attacking organisms. However, persistent pathogen infection that alters resource acquisition may impact growth and defense relationships, which could have consequences for tree resistance. We characterized systemic chemical and anatomical changes in jack pine (Pinus banksiana) in response to infection by the parasitic plant dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium americanum) and identified how the growth-defense relationship is altered due to infection severity. Our study found that the growth and defense relationship in jack pine was altered due to infection and that chemical defenses in the phloem received a relatively higher priority than radial growth and anatomical defenses. Chemical defenses in the phloem had a non-linear relationship with infection severity with increasing concentrations of monoterpenes in trees with moderate infection and decreasing concentrations at high infection. In contrast, both radial growth and vertical resin duct production decreased with increasing infection severity. While constitutive resin duct counts and many monoterpene compound concentrations were positively correlated, this relationship was not maintained in infected trees. Furthermore, radial growth and basal area increment was positively correlated with resin duct production and monoterpene concentration in non-infected trees but had fewer relationships in severely infected trees. We conclude that while both chemical and anatomical defenses may be used as indicators for potential resistance to biotic stress in pines, changes in resource allocation patterns between these defenses after infection will likely have consequences on tree resistance to subsequent biotic attacks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".