Pulmonary Manifestations and Progression of Lung Disease in Juvenile-onset Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence and extent of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with juvenile mixed connective tissue disease (JMCTD), compare pulmonary function in patients and matched controls, study associations between ILD and disease-related variables, and examine progression of pulmonary manifestations over time. METHODS: A cohort of 52 patients with JMCTD were examined in a cross-sectional study after a mean 16.2 (SD 10.3) years of disease duration with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFT) comprising spirometry, DLCO, and total lung capacity (TLC). Matched controls were examined with PFT. Previous HRCT and PFT were available in 37 and 38 patients (mean 8.8 and 10.3 yrs before study inclusion), respectively. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients with JMCTD had lower forced vital capacity (FVC), DLCO, and TLC (p < 0.01). The most frequent abnormal PFT was DLCO in 67% of patients versus 17% of controls (p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (27%) had ILD on HRCT. Most had ILD in < 10% of their lungs. ILD was associated with low values for FVC and TLC, but not with DLCO. HRCT findings did not progress significantly over time, but FVC declined (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared to controls, patients with JMCTD had impaired pulmonary function. ILD was present in 27% of patients after a mean 16 years of disease duration, mostly as mild disease, and did not progress. ILD seems to be less common in juvenile-onset than in adult-onset MCTD, and ILD in JMCTD seems mostly mild and stable over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".