MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2885950763 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-2443

Abstract 2443: Oxygen metabolism and hypoxia tolerance in organoid models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

2018· article· en· W2885950763 on OpenAlexaff
Ji Zhang, Qingquan Liu, Dan Cojocari, Mark Zaidi, Trevor D. McKee, Nikolina Radulovich, Ming‐Sound Tsao, David W. Hedley, Marianne Koritzinsky, Bradly G. Wouters

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)BiologyOrganoidMetabolismAutophagyCell biologyCancer researchTumor hypoxiaOxygenInternal medicineEndocrinologyChemistryMedicineBiochemistryApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has extremely heterogeneous hypoxic microenvironments across patients and high levels of hypoxia are correlated with increased tumor aggressiveness and resistance to therapy. However, the underlying genetic contributors to variations in hypoxia and its importance to the disease is currently unknown. We hypothesize that genetic mutations in PDAC associated with two principal factors - oxygen metabolism and hypoxia tolerance - influence the steady state levels of hypoxia in individual tumors. The demand for oxygen, which is influenced by genetic driven changes in cellular metabolism, define the levels and steepness of hypoxia gradients around perfused vessels. Tolerance to hypoxia determines the time tumor cells can survive in severe microenvironments depleted of oxygen and other nutrients. Both factors are affected by the activation of adaptive hypoxia stress response pathways including the HIF, UPR, and autophagy pathways. Method: We developed patient-derived-organoids from PDAC tumors for in vitro studies of oxygen metabolism and glycolytic rates using the Seahorse XF96. We also characterized hypoxia tolerance through monitoring of organoid growth and secondary growth under defined levels of oxygenation. In addition, we have developed an immunofluorescence image analysis pipeline to evaluate in vivo oxygen demand/consumption through the quantification of oxygen and proliferation gradients around perfused blood vessels. Results: We observed significant heterogeneities in oxygen metabolism and hypoxia tolerance across our patient derived organoid models. We also demonstrated the importance of PERK/UPR pathway in mediating both oxygen metabolism and hypoxia tolerance through regulation of ULK1, a kinase involved in the initiation of autophagy. Inhibition or knockdown of ULK1 decreased cell survival and correspondingly sensitized cells to hypoxia in organoid and tumor models. This is accompanied by accumulation of mitochondria and a corresponding increase in oxygen consumption, resulting in increased development of hypoxic cells. Conclusion: These experiments demonstrate the dual importance of oxygen metabolism and hypoxia tolerance and set the stage for the evaluation of these parameters and identification of the underlying genetic drivers of the hypoxic microenvironment. These genetic markers would be used for patient-selection and development of hypoxia-targeted therapies. Citation Format: Ji Zhang, Qingquan Liu, Dan Cojocari, Mark Zaidi, Trevor McKee, Nikolina Radulovich, Ming-Sound Tsao, David Hedley, Marianne Koritzinsky, Bradly G. Wouters. Oxygen metabolism and hypoxia tolerance in organoid models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2443.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→