Wide range dielectric and infrared spectroscopy of (Nb+In) co-doped rutile ceramics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dielectric response of ceramics of co-doped rutile $\mathrm{T}{\mathrm{i}}_{1\text{\ensuremath{-}}x}{(\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{b}}_{0.5}\mathrm{I}{\mathrm{n}}_{0.5})}_{x}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ has been measured via a combination of impedance, high-frequency coaxial, terahertz transmission, and infrared reflectivity spectroscopies spanning 15 decades of frequency between 0.1 Hz and 240 THz. It is argued that the colossal dielectric permittivity reported by Hu et al. [Hu et al., Nat. Mater. 12, 821 (2013)] has the same explanation as in the original colossal permittivity material $\mathrm{CaC}{\mathrm{u}}_{3}\mathrm{Ti}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}{\mathrm{O}}_{12}$ (CCTO), namely, a combination of the internal barrier layer capacitor (IBLC) and the surface barrier layer capacitor (SBLC) effects. The IBLC effect is caused by a microstructure consisting of insulating grain boundaries (thickness \ensuremath{\sim}1 nm and conductivity of $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{S}/\mathrm{cm})$ surrounding interior regions of bulk conductivity approximately equal to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{S}/\mathrm{cm}$. The SBLC effect is the result of a depletion layer adjacent to the contacts approximately 100 nm thick with conductivity of $5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}7}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{S}/\mathrm{cm}$. The SBLC and IBLC effects give rise to dielectric relaxations in low-frequency and radiofrequency regions, respectively. The temperature dependence of both relaxation rates measured down to 20 K is thermally activated. No separate absorption process has been observed that could be linked to giant defect dipoles. Infrared spectroscopy has revealed four weak defect-related modes at frequencies close to the Raman mode frequencies of rutile, activated in the infrared through a symmetry-breaking process. Co-doping produces a significant loss in the partial spectral weight between 75 and $350\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ associated with the lowest transverse optical mode, which softens on cooling. The loss in its spectral weight corresponds to the gain in near-infrared spectral weight, previously assigned to small polaron absorption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it