Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter emphasizes the extent to which significant social and political theories are not merely expressions of philosophy and intellectual comprehension. Rather, they are shaped by the actual social, economic, and political contexts in which they develop, and forged in processes of contestation that often involve profound divisions within society. This has been demonstrated by the work of Neal Wood and Ellen Meiksins Wood to be true with respect to the whole “canon” of Western political theory, and is no less true of the ideas of Karl Marx. While these ideas were deeply influenced by the far-reaching social, political, and cultural legacies of the French Revolution, and its many unresolved political issues, they also developed in response to the emerging social and economic relationships specific to capitalist production, as already systematized in the concepts of political economy. Although the politics of the French Revolution were grounded in the thoroughly precapitalist state and society of the ancien régime, and even in the mid-nineteenth century genuinely capitalist economic relations had barely spread beyond the English society in which they formed, Marx was able to discern their internal logic of development and emerging social domination through his critical encounter with political economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".