Facile Synthesis of Flower‐Like NiMnO <sub>3</sub> /Ni(OH) <sub>2</sub> Grown on Multifunctional Nickel Foam with Superior Capacitive Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The flower‐like NiMnO 3 /Ni(OH) 2 growing on multifunctional nickel foam is designed for the first time though a facile, eco‐friendly and straightforward hydrothermal method, in which nickel foam acts as substrate, reductant and the nickel resource. The concentration of bivalent nickel ion plays a key role for the component and capacitive performance of composite. Without outside nickel resource, NiMnO 3 are obtained, and their specific capacitance is 750 F g −1 at the current density of 1 mA cm −2 . Under the high consistence of bivalent nickel ion, the flower‐like NiMnO 3 /Ni(OH) 2 is produced. Its specific capacitance is up to 3800 F g −1 at the current density of 1 mA cm −2 . Such exceptional capacitive performance is attributed to the unique flower‐like structure, excellent contact of active materials with nickel foam substrate and the synergistic effect of constituents. This method can be extended to the synthesis of other bimetallic oxides and other more extensive composites. And the flower‐like NiMnO 3 /Ni(OH) 2 provides a feasible and potential candidate of practical applications of supercapacitor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".