MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2886023660 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-21

Abstract 21: p66ShcA is a contextual breast cancer metastasis promoter or suppressor depending on the tumor microenvironment

2018· article· en· W2886023660 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Hudson, Kyle Lewis, Julien Senécal, Alexander Kiepas, Sébastien Tabariès, Valérie Sabourin, Ryuhjin Ahn, Rachel La Selva, Peter M. Siegel, Giuseppina Ursini-Siegel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMetastasisCancer researchCancerMetastatic breast cancerMammary tumorMedicinePathologyPrimary tumorLung cancerBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Src homology and collagen A (ShcA) adaptor proteins are essential during breast cancer progression. However, the role of the largest isoform, p66ShcA, is conflicting and still poorly understood. Under high levels of stress p66ShcA is phosphorylated on serine36, within its CH2 domain, allowing it to translocate to the mitochondria and induce the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to promote apoptosis. Previously, we provided the first in vivo evidence that p66ShcA can influence both pro and anti-tumorigenic functions in ErbB2+ luminal breast cancer. Stable overexpression of p66ShcA reduced tumor outgrowth while simultaneously elevating the expression of mesenchymal genes to promote tumor plasticity. In this study, we evaluated the role of p66ShcA in metastatic dissemination to the lung in a model of basal breast cancer, which typically is associated with poor outcome. Hypothesis: p66ShcA regulates basal breast cancer metastasis to the lung. Methods: Screening a panel of basal breast cancer cells in vivo selected to the lung, liver and bone, we found p66ShcA enriched in lung and liver metastatic variant cell lines relative to parental breast cancer cells and those in vivo selected through the mammary fatpad. Using CRISPR/Cas technology we genetically deleted p66ShcA and rescued with p66ShcA-WT or a p66ShcA-S36A mutant. Lung metastatic basal breast cancer cells were injected into the fourth gland of the mammary fatpad. Tumors were measured using calipers 3 times/week following first palpation (>50mm3) followed by surgical resection to monitor the lung metastatic burden. In addition, we performed tail vein injections to monitor lung metastatic burden following direct entry into the circulation. Results: Loss of p66ShcA significantly reduced the metastatic burden to the lung following surgical tumor resection and this reduction was partially rescued by stable overexpression of wild type (WT), but not S36A mutated p66ShcA from the primary site. These effects were not due to altered anti-oxidant expression levels, changes in oxidative DNA Damage or microvessel density. Intriguingly, we found that WT-rescue of p66ShcA significantly elevated the migratory speed of breast cancer cells in vitro and corroborates our in vivo metastatic burden data. However, this is in stark contrast to our tail vein data, where WT-rescue of p66ShcA significantly inhibited lung metastasis. Conclusion: p66ShcA is required for efficient metastasis to the lung in a mitrochondrial-ROS-dependent fashion from the primary site. Our data suggest that cues from the tumor microenvironement of the mammary fatpad are essential for successful colonization and outgrowth at oxygen rich sites, such as the lung, as breast cancer cells with elevated expression of p66ShcA directly entering the circulation suppressed lung metastatic burden. Citation Format: Jesse Hudson, Kyle Lewis, Julien Senécal, Alexander Kiepas, Sébastien Tabariès, Valérie Sabourin, Ryuhjin Ahn, Rachel La Selva, Peter Siegel, Giuseppina Ursini-Siegel. p66ShcA is a contextual breast cancer metastasis promoter or suppressor depending on the tumor microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 21.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→