The State of Practice on Virtual Reality (VR) Applications: An Exploratory Study on Github and Stack Overflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) is a computer technology that holds the promise of revolutionizing the way we live. The release in 2016 of new-generation headsets from Facebook-owned Oculus and HTC has renewed the interest in that technology. Thousands of VR applications have been developed over the past years, but most software developers lack formal training on this technology. In this paper, we propose descriptive information on the state of practice of VR applications' development to understand the level of maturity of this new technology from the perspective of Software Engineering (SE). To do so, we focused on the analysis of 320 VR open source projects from Github to determine which are the most popular languages and engines used in VR projects, and evaluate the quality of the projects from a software metric perspective. To get further insights on VR development, we also manually analyzed nearly 300 questions from Stack Overflow. Our results show that (1) VR projects on GitHub are currently mostly small to medium projects, and (2) the most popular languages are JavaScript and C#. Unity is the most used game engine during VR development and the most discussed topic on Stack Overflow. Overall, our exploratory study is one of the very first of its kind for VR projects and provides material that is hopefully a starting point for further research on challenges and opportunities for VR software development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".