MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886092622 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2018-0111

Long noncoding RNA NEAT1 promotes the growth of cervical cancer cells via sponging miR-9-5p

2018· article· en· W2886092622 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiuxian Xie, Shanna Lin, Manjia Zheng, Qiutao Cai, Ya Tu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompeting endogenous RNALong non-coding RNACancer researchmicroRNACell growthBiologyRNAPTENCervical cancerCancerCancer cellCell biologyGeneSignal transductionGeneticsPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evidence has accumulated demonstrating that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) participate in the initiation and progression of cancers. In this study, we found that the lncRNA nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (NEAT1) is significantly increased in both cervical cancer tissues and cell lines. Overexpression of NEAT1 promoted the proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells. Molecular studies uncovered that NEAT1 functions as competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA), binding the micro-RNA miR-9-5p and suppressing its expression. However, we consistently found that when NEAT1 was highly expressed, it attenuated the inhibitory effect of miR-9-5p on the expression of PTEN and POU2F1, which are the targets of miR-9-5p. Consistent with the negative regulation of NEAT1 on miR-9-5p, restoration of miR-9-5p inhibited the growth-promoting effects of NEAT1 on cervical cancer cells. Taken together, these results indicated that NEAT1 plays an important role in the regulation cervical cancer cell growth by targeting miR-9-5p. Our findings characterized the possible mechanism of NEAT1 in cervical cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207