MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886130969 · doi:10.23919/acc.2018.8431673

A Linear- and Linear-Matrix-Inequality-Constrained Extended Kalman Filter

2018· article· en· W2886130969 on OpenAlexaff
Robin Aucoin, Stephen Alexander Chee, James Richard Forbes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterLinear matrix inequalityMathematicsInvariant extended Kalman filterConstrained optimizationMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Multiplicative functionLinear inequalityLinear systemAlpha beta filterFast Kalman filterExtended Kalman filterComputer scienceApplied mathematicsStatisticsInequalityArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a method for state estimation of nonlinear systems that incorporates linear- and linear-matrix-inequalities as constraints on the state estimate. Rewriting the standard maximum likelihood objective function used to derive the Kalman filter allows the Kalman gain to be found by solving a constrained optimization problem with a linear objective function subject to a linear-matrix-inequality constraint. In this formulation, additional state-estimate constraints are incorporated into the optimization problem as linear- and linear-matrix-inequality constraints. This methodology is applied in the multiplicative extended Kalman filter (MEKF) framework for three-dimensional position and attitude estimation, and is validated on a simulation of a mobile robot translating and rotating in a constrained domain space. Results are presented and compared to those for the unconstrained MEKF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207