Abstract P102: Characteristics of Practice of Primary Angioplasty in Quebec, Canada (2008-2009): A Systematic Field Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Primary angioplasty (PPCI) is the predominant reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Quebec where there are 13 PPCI centers. Our systematic province-wide field evaluation examined contemporary practice of PPCI such as arterial access site and use of stents and thrombus aspiration devices. Methods: The 82 hospitals that treat over 95% of all acute myocardial infarctions occurring annually in Quebec participated in a systematic evaluation in 2008-9. Designated medical record librarians abstracted data from medical charts of patients with a final diagnosis of myocardial infarction who presented to an emergency room with characteristic symptoms. STEMI was confirmed by ECG interpretation. Results: Of 1876 treated STEMI patients, 1505 (80%) were sent for PPCI with 594 (39%) presenting directly to a PPCI center and 911 (61%) transferred from a non PPCI-capable center. Of these, 1334 patients (88 %) underwent PPCI. Almost all (1265/1334; 95%) had stent insertion (12% wer...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".