MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2886137812 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-1140

Abstract 1140: Genes preserving stem cell state in group 3 medulloblastoma brain tumor initiating cells contribute to therapy evasion and relapse

2018· article· en· W2886137812 on OpenAlexaff
Sheila K. Singh, David Bakhshinyan, Chitra Venugopal, Ashley Adile, Mohini Singh, Maleeha Qazi, Branavan Manoranjan, Michelle Kameda-Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaBiologyPopulationCancer researchGene knockdownStem cellBrain tumorGeneInternal medicineOncologyMedicinePathologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor. Of current molecular subgroups, Group 3 patients face the highest incidence of metastatic spread and overall patient survival of less than 50%. Current clinical trials for recurrent MB patients based on genomic profiles of primary, treatment-naïve tumors provide limited clinical benefit, since recurrent metastatic MBs are highly genetically divergent from their primary tumors. By adapting the existing COG (Children's Oncology Group) protocol for children with newly diagnosed high-risk MB to the treatment of immuno-deficient mice intracranially engrafted with human MB brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs), we have characterized the rare treatment-refractory cell population in Group 3 MBs. MB cell populations recovered separately from brains and spines during the course of tumor development and therapy were comprehensively profiled for gene expression analysis, stem cell and molecular features to generate a global, comparative profile of MB cells through therapy to relapse. One of the most intriguing observations from our gene expression data was consistent over-expression in the treatment-refractory cell population of proteins belonging to the Inhibitor of DNA-binding/differentiation (ID) family (transcription factors with a basic helix-loop-helix motif that act as suppressors cellular differentiation), and a longevity-associated protein known as bactericidal/permeability-increasing fold-containing-family-B-member-4 (BPIFB4). This persistent upregulation of genes preserving undifferentiated state and cellular longevity further strengthens the hypothesis of stem-cell like cells driving tumor relapse in MB. Targeting ID1 and BPIFB4 using both knockdown (KD) and knockout (KO) strategies has resulted in decreased self-renewal and tumorigenicity of both primary and recurrent MB cells, further highlighting their potential as novel therapeutic targets in MB. Our differential genomic and gene expression profiles of the “treatment-responsive” tumors against those that fail therapy have successfully contributed to discovery and characterization of novel therapeutic targets for the most aggressive subgroup of MB. Citation Format: Sheila Kumari Singh, David Bakhshinyan, Chitra Venugopal, Ashley Adile, Mohini Singh, Maleeha Qazi, Branavan Manoranjan, Michelle Kameda-Smith. Genes preserving stem cell state in group 3 medulloblastoma brain tumor initiating cells contribute to therapy evasion and relapse [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1140.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→