Bibliographic record
Abstract
What does Heron teach about our time of turbulent multi-scalar issues like species extinctions, climate change, and related social injustices? In this article, I consider this question by engaging the changing presence of various Herons in the wetlands of southern Ontario, Canada, in a context of colonial and modern urbanizing processes that continue to have impacts. The teachings Heron offers goes beyond critical reflections on external ecological changes, for I also symbolically relate with its wetland home as a place in midst of the Kaswén:ta or Two Row Wampum. This early treaty between Indigenous Canoe and Colonial Ship was meant to situate us on our Common Waters in a way that can honor diverse ways. Though the subsequent colonial focus on conversion of people and creation would manifest an array of impacts, I am guided back to the Two Row as a model for bringing into dialogue Indigenous and conservationist understandings. It is in the still presence of Heron that different understandings and acts emerge on what it will take to sustainably respond to those colonizing ways that continue to fuel global scale issues like extinction and climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".