Encoding Visual Sensitivity by MaxPol Convolution Filters for Image Sharpness Assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel design of Human Visual System (HVS) response in a convolutional filter form to decompose meaningful features that are closely tied with image sharpness level. No-reference (NR) Image sharpness assessment (ISA) techniques have emerged as the standard of image quality assessment in diverse imaging applications. Despite their high correlation with subjective scoring, they are challenging for practical considerations due to high computational cost and lack of scalability across different image blurs. We bridge this gap by synthesizing the HVS response as a linear combination of Finite Impulse Response (FIR) derivative filters to boost the falloff of high band frequency magnitudes in natural imaging paradigm. The numerical implementation of the HVS filter is carried out with MaxPol filter library that can be arbitrarily set for any differential orders and cutoff frequencies to balance out the estimation of informative features and noise sensitivities. Utilized by HVS filter, we then design an innovative NR-ISA metric called "HVS-MaxPol" that (a) requires minimal computational cost, (b) produce high correlation accuracy with image sharpness level, and (c) scales to assess synthetic and natural image blur. Specifically, the synthetic blur images are constructed by blurring the raw images using Gaussian filter, while natural blur is observed from real-life application such as motion, out-of-focus, luminance contrast, etc. Furthermore, we create a natural benchmark database in digital pathology for validation of image focus quality in whole slide imaging systems called "FocusPath" consisting of 864 blurred images. Thorough experiments are designed to test and validate the efficiency of HVS-MaxPol across different blur databases and state-of-the-art NR-ISA metrics. The experiment result indicates that our metric has the best overall performance with respect to speed, accuracy and scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it