MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886239612

User Rights Advocacy: The Australian Experience

2018· article· en· W2886239612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Delia Browne

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceInternet privacyPublic relationsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delia Browne, National Copyright Director for the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) Education Council, will share insights from the Australian experience with advocating for user rights during a copyright review.\nAustralia has conducted two extensive copyright law reform inquiries – the Australian Law Reform Commission Inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy in 2012/13 and the Productivity Commission Inquiry into IP arrangement in 2016/17. Both reviews supported the introduction of a flexible fair use exception to replace the outdated fair dealing and other exceptions and a range of other recommendations including streamlining the education statutory licenses, introducing new exceptions to the anti-circumvention TPM provisions for libraries, archives, education and organizations supporting disability access, expanding safe harbours to educational institutions, etc.\nA raft of new legislation and regulations was introduced finally in 2017 with a whole more copyright law in the pipeline in 2018. Delia will discuss the recent 2017 copyright law reform amendments and the upcoming 2018 further consultations by government on flexible fair use or other flexible use models and what is still missing and needs to be fixed.\nShe will also discuss what the Australian Education sector learnt from 2012 Canada copyright law reform and how Australia’s education sector responded to the rights holders’ attempts to discredit Canada’s 2012 copyright law reform in particular fair dealing for education.\nDelia Browne is the national copyright director of the National Copyright Unit (NCU), Copyright Advisory Group, COAG Education Council. Delia is a highly respected copyright lawyer and policy advocate. She is currently leading the advocacy for the introduction of flexible fair use and other education-related copyright law reform on behalf of the Schools and TAFE sector.\nShe is the Education Sector Lead of Creative Commons Australia and works closely with Creative Commons, Open Society Institute and many other international organizations advocating OER and copyright law reform. She is one of the co-drafters of the Cape Town Declaration on Open Education and one of the co-founders and President of Peer 2 Peer University (P2PU)  www.p2pu.org.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207