MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886246186 · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5353

Model‐free adaptive learning control scheme for wind turbines with doubly fed induction generators

2018· article· en· W2886246186 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Renewable Power Generation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsEnergie NB Power (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerInduction generatorScheme (mathematics)Doubly fed electric machineControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceAdaptive controlControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsAC powerArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The classical control mechanisms of the wind turbines are generally based on precise modelling approaches to ensure robust and effective interplay between the wind turbines and the main power grids in both autonomous and grid‐connected modes. This study presents an innovative intelligent control system for the doubly fed induction generator wind turbines. The proposed system uses model‐free control polices. The online controller is based on a policy iteration reinforcement learning paradigm along with an adaptive actor‐critic technique. It is shown to be robust against the turbine's high non‐linearities and stochastic variations in the input–output conditions. These are associated with single and double rotor doubly fed large‐scale induction generators driven by wind turbines in the range of 5–7 MW. The performance of the controller is validated against challenging scenarios of coexisting undesired situations like severe wind changes with load excursions and abrupt shifts in the loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it