Improved IRE1 and PERK Pathway Sensors for Multiplex Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Assay Reveal Stress Response to Nuclear Dyes Used for Image Segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to a variety of insults the unfolded protein response (UPR) is a major cell program quickly engaged to promote either cell survival or if stress levels cannot be relieved, apoptosis. UPR relies on three major pathways, named from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident proteins IRE1α, PERK, and ATF6 that mediate response. Current tools to measure the activation of these ER stress response pathways in mammalian cells are cumbersome and not compatible with high-throughput imaging. In this study, we present IRE1α and PERK sensors with improved sensitivity, based on the canonical events of xbp1 splicing and ATF4 translation at ORF3. These sensors can be integrated into host cell genomes through lentiviral transduction, opening the way for use in a wide array of immortalized or primary mammalian cells. We demonstrate that high-throughput single-cell analysis offers unprecedented kinetic details compared with endpoint measurement of IRE1α and PERK activity. Finally, we point out the limitations of dye-based nuclear segmentation for live cell imaging applications, as we show that these dyes induce UPR and can strongly affect both the kinetic and dynamic responses of IRE1α and PERK pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it