Thermodynamic instability of polymeric liquids in large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow from corotational Maxwell fluid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract When polymeric liquids are subjected to oscillatory shear flow, if the amplitude of the shear rate is high enough, the shear stress response will become aperiodic. This has been variously attributed to fracture, common line ingress, slip, shear-banding and phase change, however, the underlying causes for these is unclear. In this paper we explore the creation of new thermodynamic phases as the trigger for these phenomena. Specifically, we examine two thermodynamic instability criteria that have been suggested for large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow (LAOS). One of these criteria is based on non-equilibrium thermodynamics (the Ziegler criterion), and the other, on equilibrium thermodynamics (the free energy criterion). The advent of exact solutions for stress responses to LAOS provokes this investigation. We use one such exact solution to evaluate these criteria for the simplest relevant constitutive model, the corotational Maxwell fluid. By relevant , we mean at least predicting higher harmonics in LAOS. We find that, in steady shear flow, the Ziegler instability arises when the dimensionless shear rate exceeds the square root of the golden ratio, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mtext>Wi</mml:mtext> <mml:mo>></mml:mo> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mi>φ</mml:mi> </mml:msqrt> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> </mml:math> Applying our results to instability measurements on dissolved polybutadiene, we find the Ziegler criterion to be useful at low frequency, and the free energy criterion to be useful elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it