MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886330414 · doi:10.11159/icepr18.179

Mapping Sea Water Surface in Persian Gulf, Oil Spill Detection Using Sentinal-1 Images

2018· article· en· W2886330414 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Meysam Majidi Nezhad, Daniele Groppi, Pablo Marzialetti, Giuseppe Piras, Giovanni Laneve

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersianOil spillEnvironmental scienceOceanographySurface waterGeologyRemote sensingPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study investigates an oil spill event in the Al Khafji region using Sentinel 1 SAR images.Al Khafji is on the border between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in the Persian Gulf and it is considered a neutral zone.Al Khafji region has the potential to produce more than 470,000 barrels of oil per day (Mbbl/d).Methods based on multi sensor satellite images (Sentinel-2, Landsat 8, Terra, Cosmo_SkyMed, RADARSAT, etc.) analysis have been developed for detecting oil slicks from known natural seeps as well as oil spill events.In this paper, one of these methods is applied to Sentinel 1 images of a known area of natural oil outflow and of a recent oil spill event in Al Khafji zone.The Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is recognized as the most important remote sensing tool for sea and ocean waters oil spill monitoring, recording, documentation and dissemination.Oil spills have been detected and characterized by using the SAR images over the Persian Gulf.In particular, this paper discusses oil spills detection in the Persian Gulf assessed by using Sentinel 1 (SAR) images.Results showed the suitability of the VV polarization of the Sentinel-1 for detecting oil-spills as well as the reduced utility of the VH polarization in this context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on New TechnologiesSame topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207