Global Health Education at Home: Canadian Medical Students’ Perspectives After Learning Alongside Haitian Peers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore how host medical students learn from visiting foreign students, by reporting on a global health program that has invited two or three Haitian medical students each year since 2013 to a Canadian medical school for a summer anatomy program. METHOD: In 2017, the authors conducted a qualitative descriptive study that collected data through one-on-one, semistructured interviews with 10 Canadian students, who participated in the Université Quisqueya-McGill University collaborative, a bidirectional global health education initiative, 2013-2016. The authors' critical constructivist thematic analysis, while exploratory, was sensitized by their knowledge of contemporary frameworks of global health competencies, a postcolonial understanding of power relations, and three key concepts (agency, cultural humility, and reflexivity). RESULTS: The authors found two phenomena related to bidirectional exchange: the nature of the relationship between Canadian and Haitian students, and elements of the learning experience that facilitated transformation and growth. There were three important components to the nature of the relationship between Canadian and Haitian students-reflection on practices and privilege, negotiation of power dynamics, and perception of Haitian students as agents-and three components of the learning experience that facilitated transformation and growth-working in groups, common learning objectives, and informal social gatherings. CONCLUSIONS: Bidirectional programs may have implications for Canadian students' perception of the agency of international medical learners and may prompt self-reflection that manifests in a range of ways, including an experience of culture shock at home. These tensions seemed to create space to practice reflexivity and cultural humility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".