Comparative anther and pollen tetrad development in functionally monoecious <i>Pseuduvaria trimera</i> (Annonaceae), and evolutionary implications for anther indehiscence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multiple evolutionary origins and diverse morphologies of unisexual flowers in angiosperms indicate that many different developmental mechanisms [sporophytic and (or) gametophytic tissues] underlie patterns of sex differentiation, yet, these mechanisms leading to unisexuality remain largely unresolved. In Pseuduvaria trimera (W.G. Craib) Y.C.F. Su & R.M.K. Saunders, morphologically hermaphroditic flowers are functionally female due to indehiscent anthers, but the developmental and anatomical mechanisms preventing their dehiscence are still unknown. Anther and pollen development were compared in both male and functionally female flowers using histological observations to test whether anther indehiscence results from a sporophytic and (or) gametophytic default. The epidermis, endothecium, middle layers, and pollen development were identical in the two floral morphs, but variations occurred in the tapetum and stomium regions. In male flowers, concurrently with the binucleate tapetal cell degeneration, the appearance of intercellular spaces and lysis of the stomium region cells lead to anther dehiscence. Conversely, in the functionally female flowers, trinucleate tapetum appears with delayed degradation, and the persistent cells with a highly vacuolated cytoplasm and stomium region remain intact at maturity. Sporophytic tissues with tapetum abnormalities and stomium integrity are, thus, responsible for anther indehiscence. Lack of microspore rotation in P. trimera might indicate a different evolutionary origin of pollen tetrad formation in this family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".