More Polish or More British? Identity of The Second Generation of Poles Born in Great Britain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultural identity refers to “the content of values as guiding principles, to meaning of symbols, and to life-styles that individuals share with others, though not necessarily within recognizable groups ” (Boski, 2002: 457). The core of cultural identity is the personal meaning and personal evaluation of symbols and values rather than just the knowledge (Boski, 2006). Symbols as a separate, from values, aspect of cultural identity seem to catch less attention among scholars than other dimensions of cultural identity such as language, religion, social activities, family life, and maintenance of cultural heritage (Rosenthal and Hrynevich, 1984). Srole, in his publication from 1940 based on a study on multi-ethnic US city, was probably one of the first to describe cultural orientation based on different types of national (and patriotic) symbolisms. He referred to American-national, Ancestral-national (related to foreign born) and Bi-national symbols (Rudmin, 2003). The relation between cultural symbols, emotional states and cultural identity was confirmed in a study by Fong (1965; za: Rudmin, 2003). Studies, among Polish emigrants in Canada and USA, show that the more personally significant is a certain symbol; the strongest is symbolic identity (Boski, 1992). These findings
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".