Lost in Translation? Exploring Outcomes of Nunavut’s Resource Development Training and Employment Policies for Inuit of Northern Baffin Island
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Northern Review 47 (2018): 31–57On 6 September 2013 the Mary River Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement (MRIIBA) was signed between the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA), representing the Inuit of Baffin Island, and Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (BIMC). Among other things, the MRIIBA is intended to promote Inuit employment and training as a way of maximizing local benefits from the mine. Drawing from qualitative research that followed twenty-two formerly-employed and employed mine workers, this article critically evaluates the agreement’s outcomes, which have yet to fulfill the stated employment goals and training provisions. Contributing to these dismal outcomes is a communications gap between local Inuit and the land claims organizations responsible for brokering the agreement with the project proponent. The article explores the resulting gaps in communication between community members and various stakeholders involved with the project, and concludes by offering considerations for future agreements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it