MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886625991 · doi:10.1113/jp275804

Sympathoexcitation following intermittent hypoxia in rat is mediated by circulating angiotensin II acting at the carotid body and subfornical organ

2018· article· en· W2886625991 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Seung Jae Kim, Angelina Y. Fong, Paul M. Pilowsky, Stephen B.G. Abbott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversity of SydneyHeart Research InstituteAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsIntermittent hypoxiaAngiotensin IIInternal medicineMedicineHypoxia (environmental)Sympathetic nervous systemEndocrinologyRenin–angiotensin systemDenervationCarotid bodyMicroneurographyBaroreflexSubfornical organBlood pressureHeart rateChemistryStimulationObstructive sleep apnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: In anaesthetized rats, acute intermittent hypoxia increases sympathetic nerve activity, sympathetic peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity and central sympathetic-respiratory coupling. Renin-angiotensin system inhibition prevents the sympathetic effects of intermittent hypoxia, with intermittent injections of angiotensin II into the systemic circulation replicating these effects. Bilateral carotid body denervation reduces the sympathetic effects of acute intermittent hypoxia and eliminates the increases in chemoreflex sensitivity and sympathetic-respiratory coupling. Pharmacological inhibition of the subfornical organ also reduces the sympathetic effects of acute intermittent hypoxia, although it has no effect on the increases in chemoreflex sensitivity and central sympathetic-respiratory coupling. Combining both interventions eliminates the sympathetic effects of both intermittent hypoxia and angiotensin II. ABSTRACT: Circulating angiotensin II (Ang II) is vital for arterial pressure elevation following intermittent hypoxia in rats, although its importance in the induction of sympathetic changes is unclear. We tested the contribution of the renin-angiotensin system to the effects of acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) in anaesthetized and ventilated rats. There was a 33.7 ± 2.9% increase in sympathetic nerve activity (SNA), while sympathetic chemoreflex sensitivity and central sympathetic-respiratory coupling increased by one-fold following AIH. The sympathetic effects of AIH were prevented by blocking angiotensin type 1 receptors with systemic losartan. Intermittent systemic injections of Ang II (Int.Ang II) elicited similar sympathetic responses to AIH. To identify the neural pathways responsible for the effects of AIH and Int.Ang II, we performed bilateral carotid body denervation, which reduced the increase in SNA by 56% and 45%, respectively. Conversely, pharmacological inhibition of the subfornical organ (SFO), an established target of circulating Ang II, reduced the increase in SNA following AIH and Int.Ang II by 65% and 59%, respectively, although it did not prevent the sensitization of the sympathetic peripheral chemoreflex, nor the increase in central sympathetic-respiratory coupling. Combined carotid body denervation and inhibition of the SFO eliminated the enhancement of SNA following AIH and Int.Ang II. Repeated systemic injections of phenylephrine caused an elevation in SNA similar to AIH, and this effect was prevented by a renin inhibitor, aliskiren. Our findings show that the sympathetic effects of AIH are the result of RAS-mediated activations of the carotid bodies and the SFO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207