MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2886737079 · doi:10.1107/s2056989018010939

A new structural model for NiFe hydrogenases: an unsaturated analogue of a classic hydrogenase model leads to more enzyme-like Ni—Fe distance and interplanar fold

2018· article· en· W2886737079 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel J. Harrison, Alan J. Lough, Ulrich Fekl

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsChemistryHexafluorophosphateCrystallographyOrthorhombic crystal systemNickelStereochemistryCrystal structureHydrogenaseOctahedronEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex cation in the title compound, (carbonyl-1κC)(1η5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)(μ-2,3,9,10-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetrathiaundeca-2,9-diene-1,11-diido-1κ2 S,S′′′:2κ4 S,S′,S′′,S′′′)ironnickel(Fe—Ni) hexafluorophosphate, [FeNi(C10H15)(C11H18S4)(CO)]PF6 or [Ni(L′)FeCp*(CO)]PF6, is composed of the nickel complex fragment [Ni(L′)] coordinated as a metalloligand (using S1 and S4) to the [FeCp*(CO)]+ fragment, where (L′)2− is [S—C(Me)=C(Me)—S—(CH2)3—S—C(Me)=C(Me)—S]2− and where Cp*− is cyclo-C5(Me)5 − (pentamethylcyclopentadienyl). The ratio of hexafluorophosphate anion per complex cation is 1:1. The structure at 150 K has orthorhombic (Pbcn) symmetry. The atoms of the complex cation are located on general positions (multiplicity = 8), whereas there are two independent hexafluorophosphate anions, each located on a twofold axis (Wyckoff position 4c; multiplicity = 4). The structure of the new dimetallic cation [Ni(L′)FeCp*(CO)]+ can be described as containing a three-legged piano-stool environment for iron [Cp*Fe(CO)`S2'] and an approximately square-planar `S4' environment for Ni. The NiS2Fe diamond-shaped substructure is notably folded at the S—S hinge: the angle between the NiS2 plane and the FeS2 plane normals is 64.85 (6)°. Largely because of this fold, the nickel–iron distance is relatively short, at 2.9195 (8) Å. The structural data for the complex cation, which contains a new unsaturated `S4' ligand (two C=C double bonds), provide an interesting comparison with the known NiFe hydrogenase models containing a saturated `S4'-ligand analogue having the same number of carbon atoms in the ligand backbone, namely with the structures of [Ni(L)FeCp(CO)]+ (as the PF6 − salt, CH2Cl2 solvate) and [Ni(L)FeCp*(CO)]+ (as the PF6 − salt), where (L)2− is [S—CH2—CH2—S—(CH2)3—S—CH2—CH2—S]2− and Cp− is cyclopentadienyl. The saturated analogues [Ni(L)FeCp(CO)]+ and [Ni(L)FeCp*(CO)]+ have similar Ni—Fe distances: 3.1727 (6), 3.1529 (7) Å (two independent molecules in the unit cell) and 3.111 (5) Å, respectively, for the two complexes, whereas [Ni(L′)FeCp*(CO)]+ described here stands out with a much shorter Ni—Fe distance [2.9196 (8) Å]. Also, [Ni(L)FeCp(CO)]+ and [Ni(L)FeCp*(CO)]+ show interplanar fold angles that are similar between the two: 39.56 (5), 41.99 (5) (independent molecules in the unit cell) and 47.22 (9) °, respectively, whereas [Ni(L′)FeCp*(CO)]+ possesses a much more pronounced fold [64.85 (6)°]. Given that larger fold angles and shorter Ni—Fe distances are considered to be structurally closer to the enzyme, unsaturation in an `S4'-ligand of the type (S—C2—S—C3—S—C2—S)2− seems to increase structural resemblance to the enzyme for structural models of the type [Ni(`S4')FeCp R (CO)]+ (Cp R = Cp or Cp*).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsFrench-language works237,207