MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887036022 · doi:10.1002/jcu.22632

Speckle tracking carotid artery circumferential strain is a marker of arterial sclerosis but not coronary atherosis

2018· article· en· W2887036022 on OpenAlex
Daniel M. Patton, Terry Li, Marie‐France Hétu, Andrew G. Day, Erika Preece, M. Matangi, Amer M. Johri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Ultrasound · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseStenosisArterial stiffnessDiabetes mellitusBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Circumferential speckle tracking carotid artery strain is a novel method of quantifying vessel wall stiffness. We hypothesized that carotid wall stiffness would be associated with carotid intimal medial thickening (a medial process associated with risk factors), but not coronary artery disease (an intimal process). METHODS: Bilateral carotid artery ultrasound was conducted on outpatients who had previously undergone elective coronary angiography. Mean carotid artery far wall circumferential strain (FWCS) was assessed for correlations with coronary angiographic stenosis, cardiac risk factors, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), and carotid plaque. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty five (165) patients were studied. No significant association was found between the presence of coronary artery disease on angiography and mean FWCS. FWCS was higher in current tobacco smokers. In addition, carotid strain was found to decrease with increased age (r = -0.33, P < 0.001). When adjusted for pulse pressure (PP), FWCS/PP was negatively correlated with mean CIMT (r = -0.29, P = 0.002) and bulb maximum plaque height (r = -0.27, P = 0.004). Hypertension and diabetes were associated with decreased FWCS/PP (increased wall stiffness). CONCLUSIONS: While no clear relationship between carotid strain and coronary artery disease was observed, increased CIMT, carotid plaque, and cardiac risk factors were associated with decreased carotid strain. Further work is required to explore the relationship between carotid strain and cardiovascular events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it