MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887099535 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-5176

Abstract 5176: Cell free malignant ascites fluid facilitates gastric adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastasis

2018· article· en· W2887099535 on OpenAlexaff
Chantelle A. Janeiro, Vivian Stavrakos, Malak Alzahrani, Roni Rayes, France Bourdeau, Betty Giannias, Nicholas Bertos, Veena Sangwan, Jonathan Cools‐Lartigue, Jonathan Spicer, Lorenzo Ferri

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetastasisPeritoneumMedicineCancerPathologyCancer cellAdenocarcinomaAscitesPeritoneal cavityPeritoneal fluidCancer researchIn vivoCellInternal medicineBiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gastric adenocarcinoma is the fastest rising malignancy in North America. It is commonly associated with malignant ascites (MA), the pathological accumulation of fluid containing cancer cells in the peritoneum. Peritoneal metastasis is the most common site of gastric cancer (GC) progression after curative intent surgery and is the leading cause of death. Upon peritoneal dissemination, the malignant process is deemed non-curative as it is rarely amenable to surgical resection and chemotherapeutic regimens are simply palliative. We hypothesize that cell-free MA increases the potential of GC cells to worsen peritoneal metastasis. Gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines (human: MKN-45, SNU-5, KATO III, OKAJIMA; murine NCC-S1, NCC-S1M) were incubated with cell-free MA and their metastatic ability assessed with static in vitro adhesion assays, as well as migration assays. A novel ex vivo peritoneal metastasis model further corroborated the in vitro results, where cancer cell adhesion to stripped human peritoneum was assessed by co-incubation with non- and pre-stimulated cancer cells. Gross liver metastasis was monitored over several weeks after in vivo intra-peritoneal and intra-splenic injections, whereby C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with control media or stimulated NCC-S1M cells. Incubation of human GC cells and/or human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) with cell-free MA resulted in a significant three to five-fold increase of GC cell adhesion to HPMC compared to non-stimulated condition (P<0.05), as measured by inverted fluorescent microscopy. In addition, the murine GC cells incubated with MA showed a significant eight-fold increase on average (P<0.05) in GC cell adhesion to HPMC compared to non-stimulated condition. Cell-free MA was shown to significantly enhance ex vivo SNU-5 cell adhesion to stripped human peritoneum by a two to four-fold increase (P<0.05) compared to non-stimulated condition. Liver metastases were visible in mice that received in vivo injections of ascites-stimulated NCC-S1M cancer cells by day 25, yet not in mice inoculated with control media. Several factors (ANG-2, HGF, ICAM-1, IL-8, TIMP-2, uPAR, VEGF, NAP-2, MIF) were shown to be upregulated in MA samples compared to a cirrhotic ascites control, using a multiplex ELISA. In particular, VEGF was upregulated 11 to 25-fold, and MIF two to 12-fold. The results demonstrated that MA plays a significant role in facilitating GC cell adhesion to peritoneal mesothelia, an important early step in the peritoneal metastatic cascade. MA must therefore provide an environment that supports tumour growth and spread. A more comprehensive understanding of the molecular network is essential to determine the role of cell free MA fluid in GC progression, allowing for the identification of potential therapeutic targets for this aggressive malignancy. Citation Format: Chantelle A. Janeiro, Vivian Stavrakos, Malak Alzahrani, Roni F. Rayes, France Bourdeau, Betty Giannias, Nicholas Bertos, Veena Sangwan, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Jonathan D. Spicer, Lorenzo E. Ferri. Cell free malignant ascites fluid facilitates gastric adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5176.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207