The effects of emamectin benzoate or ivermectin spiked sediment on juvenile American lobsters (Homarus americanus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the effects of a range of ½-log concentrations of emamectin benzoate (commercially applied as SLICE®) and ivermectin (commercially applied as IVOMEC®) on juvenile American lobster, Homarus americanus. Phase I of the research assessed acute (up to 4 days) and chronic (30-day) toxicity of sediment dosed with the active ingredients emamectin benzoate (EMB) formulated as SLICE® or ivermectin (IVM) formulated as IVOMEC® at various nominal concentrations (EMB: 15, 48, 150, 475 and 1500 ng g−1 wet sediment; IVM: 3, 9.5, 30, 95 and 300 ng g−1 wet sediment) on juvenile Atlantic lobster (stages IV). Phase II evaluated sublethal effects (e.g., growth, moulting success) of all lobster surviving past the 30 day exposure period, over an additional 41 days. Chemical analysis of EMB and IVM in sediment samples from the exposure tanks revealed a strong linear association (R2 values 0.99 and 0.98 for EMB and IVM, respectively) between nominal dose and measured concentration of compound. EMB exposure concentrations at very high levels (≥ 343.3 ng g−1) were acutely toxic to juvenile lobster such that 100% of lobsters had died after 13 days of exposure. The maximum cumulative mortality of lobsters exposed to the highest concentrations of EMB and IVM was 100% after 10 days and 25 days, respectively. The 10-day LC50 estimates (± 95% CI) for EMB and IVM were 250.23 ± 90.4 and 212.14 ± 202.64 ng g−1, respectively. Using abnormal behaviour as an indicator, the 15-day EC50 estimates (± 95% CI) for EMB and IVM were 96.19 ± 51.42 and 15.82 ± 6.93 ng g−1, respectively. The NOEC (no observed effect concentration) for abnormal behaviour was 0.0 ng g−1 for each product and the LOEC (lowest observed effect concentration) was 8.8 and > 3.0 ng g−1 for EMB and IVM, respectively. Observations on sublethal effects included delayed moulting to stage VI and reduced growth at higher exposure concentrations for both therapeutants. Using failure to moult to stage V or VI as an indicator, the 15-day EC50 estimates (± 95% CI) for EMB and IVM were 32.72 ± 18.26 and 14.00 ± 12.43 ng g−1, respectively. The NOEC for failure to moult to stage V only was 343.3 and 14.7 ng g−1 for EMB and IVM, respectively. Whereas, the LOEC was 1066.7 and > 61.0 ng g−1 for EMB and IVM, respectively. The concentrations of EMB and IVM tested in the present study were acutely toxic to juvenile lobster exposed to the highest dosages (343.3 and 1066.7 ng EMB g−1 and 61.0 and 300.0 ng IVM g−1). There was significant evidence of chronic toxicity, longer exposure increased mortality with LT50 values decreasing with increasing test material concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".