MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887238252 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.075

The effects of emamectin benzoate or ivermectin spiked sediment on juvenile American lobsters (Homarus americanus)

2018· article· en· W2887238252 on OpenAlexafffund
Dounia Daoud, Anne McCarthy, Cory Dubetz, Duane E. Barker

Bibliographic record

VenueEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaHuntsman Marine Science CentreHomarus
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsHomarusEmamectin benzoateIvermectinJuvenileBiologySedimentAmerican lobsterFisheryZoologyCrustaceanEcologyPesticide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the effects of a range of ½-log concentrations of emamectin benzoate (commercially applied as SLICE®) and ivermectin (commercially applied as IVOMEC®) on juvenile American lobster, Homarus americanus. Phase I of the research assessed acute (up to 4 days) and chronic (30-day) toxicity of sediment dosed with the active ingredients emamectin benzoate (EMB) formulated as SLICE® or ivermectin (IVM) formulated as IVOMEC® at various nominal concentrations (EMB: 15, 48, 150, 475 and 1500 ng g−1 wet sediment; IVM: 3, 9.5, 30, 95 and 300 ng g−1 wet sediment) on juvenile Atlantic lobster (stages IV). Phase II evaluated sublethal effects (e.g., growth, moulting success) of all lobster surviving past the 30 day exposure period, over an additional 41 days. Chemical analysis of EMB and IVM in sediment samples from the exposure tanks revealed a strong linear association (R2 values 0.99 and 0.98 for EMB and IVM, respectively) between nominal dose and measured concentration of compound. EMB exposure concentrations at very high levels (≥ 343.3 ng g−1) were acutely toxic to juvenile lobster such that 100% of lobsters had died after 13 days of exposure. The maximum cumulative mortality of lobsters exposed to the highest concentrations of EMB and IVM was 100% after 10 days and 25 days, respectively. The 10-day LC50 estimates (± 95% CI) for EMB and IVM were 250.23 ± 90.4 and 212.14 ± 202.64 ng g−1, respectively. Using abnormal behaviour as an indicator, the 15-day EC50 estimates (± 95% CI) for EMB and IVM were 96.19 ± 51.42 and 15.82 ± 6.93 ng g−1, respectively. The NOEC (no observed effect concentration) for abnormal behaviour was 0.0 ng g−1 for each product and the LOEC (lowest observed effect concentration) was 8.8 and > 3.0 ng g−1 for EMB and IVM, respectively. Observations on sublethal effects included delayed moulting to stage VI and reduced growth at higher exposure concentrations for both therapeutants. Using failure to moult to stage V or VI as an indicator, the 15-day EC50 estimates (± 95% CI) for EMB and IVM were 32.72 ± 18.26 and 14.00 ± 12.43 ng g−1, respectively. The NOEC for failure to moult to stage V only was 343.3 and 14.7 ng g−1 for EMB and IVM, respectively. Whereas, the LOEC was 1066.7 and > 61.0 ng g−1 for EMB and IVM, respectively. The concentrations of EMB and IVM tested in the present study were acutely toxic to juvenile lobster exposed to the highest dosages (343.3 and 1066.7 ng EMB g−1 and 61.0 and 300.0 ng IVM g−1). There was significant evidence of chronic toxicity, longer exposure increased mortality with LT50 values decreasing with increasing test material concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcotoxicology and Environmental SafetySame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207