Perencanaan Sistem Plambing Air Bersih dan Air Buangan Gedung SMK Negeri 3 Kota Jambi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plumbing system installation is an important part of building design. To built SMK Negeri 3 Jambi City needs a good plumbing installation design in order to meet the proper resident’s sanitation. The purpose of this study is to design plumbing system for clean water and wastewater at office building SMK Negeri 3 Jambi City. The design of plumbing system based on SNI 03-7065-2005 about Plumbing System Design Standard (Tata Cara Perencanaan Sistem Plambing). The clean water resources is pumped from ground water to the roof tank, then distributed to plumbing units by gravity. The water capacity in office building is calculated at 34,2 m3/day. Roof tank capacity collects clean water in amount of 7600 liter a day, using double roof tank with each capacity is 5000 liter. The roof tank placed on a tower with 1,71 m high. Diameter of clean water pipes are 50-65 mm. The power of water pump is 0,77 kW. The wastewater distribution system uses a separate system, where grey water delivered to Wastewater Treatment Plant and black water delivered to septic tank. Diameter of grey water pipes are 65-75 mm, while diameter of black water pipes are 100 mm. Type of pipe used in this plumbing installation is Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). Key words : Clean water; Wastewater; Plumbing system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".