MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887363292 · doi:10.1109/mercon.2018.8421921

Real-Time 2-D FIR Trapezoidal Digital Filters for 2.4 GHz Aperture Receiver Applications

2018· article· en· W2887363292 on OpenAlexaff
Viduneth Ariyarathna, Vítor A. Coutinho, Sravan Pulipati, Arjuna Madanayake, Ravi T. Wijesekara, Chamira U. S. EdussooriyaD, Len T. Brutons, Thushara Gunaratne, Renato J. Cintra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite impulse responseDigital filterComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAcousticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the implementation of a two-dimensional (2-D) finite-impulse-response (FIR) trapezoidal filter based beamforming array receiver. A 2.4 GHz 16-element receive-mode IQ array is designed and used for physically measuring the beam patterns corresponding to 2-D FIR trapezoidal filters. The 16-element beamformer is implemented using the reconfigurable open architecture computing hardware version-2 (ROACH-2) field programmable gate array (FPGA) platform to perform analog to digital conversion and digital signal processing. The 2-D FIR trapezoidal filter is designed as a 16-spatial input 32-tap filter and is implemented targeting the ROACH-2’s Xilinx Virtex 6 (sx475t) FPGA chip as a filter-and-sum architecture. The receiver array is precisely rotated (keeping the transmitter fixed) to digitally measure the received energy by integrating the instantaneous power of the output of the 2-D FIR trapezoidal filter for each angle of reception. The main lobe of the measured beam pattern is well aligned with the simulated beam pattern, and the highest measured side-lobe level is −17.8 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207