Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the invention of nanotubes has begun to find its own use area.Computer related researches have been developed for the first time in the world a logical computer circuit in a single molecule.Carbon atoms formed, hair from a tube-shaped molecule of 100,000 times thinner than the hair, carbon nanotubes produced the "voltage Inverter", one of the three basic circuits found on today's computers.In addition, the new generation transistor design is used in electronics.In terms of mechanical properties, the elasticity modulus is in the order of TPa.By the using of nano strain gauge devices, the mechanical properties of the material measurements will be more accurate.In this paper, nanobeam is formulated as an Euler-Bernoulli beam and the equation of motion will be solved by using central finite differences method.By the invention of carbon nanotubes by Iijima [1], science has gained a new perspective.In the name of this perspective, nanomaterial is not so wrong.Nano scale materials have good electrical and mechanical properties.Thus, they can be applied for nanodevices and nanocomposites.After 1960s, Eringen concentrated its work on the mechanics of continuous materials and pioneered this branch of science.In this way, the effects of the borders between atoms are better understood [2][3][4].In 2009, Abbaschian and Reed-Hill examined the formation of dislocation between atoms, in detail [5].Wang and Varadan studied the behavior of free vibration in the swcnt Timoshenko beam using nonlocal elasticity in 2006 [6].In this study, affected Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs) will be studied using transverse vibration of CNTs in the framework of the Nonlocal Elasticity theory.Equations of motion of carbon nanotubes, numerical results are obtained for affected CNTs by using Euler Bernoulli beam theory.The effects of the first mode frequency parameter of SWCNT has affected (missing) mass are studied by using Central Finite Differences Method.The location of missing mass and nonlocal parameters on vibration of SWCNT is investigated.Simply Supported boundary condition is considered.The purpose of this study is to fill this gap by investigating vibration problems of carbon nanotubes have missing mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".