Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monovalent nontransition metals are robust Fermi liquids. They defy superconductivity even at lowest temperatures (Li is a minor exception: [Formula: see text] mK). However, Thapa, Pandey, Ghosh and collaborators 8 have reported, from 2018, signals for transient and unstable granular superconductivity at ambient temperatures in Ag nanoparticles embedded in Au matrix. We develop a theory, where competing superconducing, CDW and SDW orders lose and get confined (go off-shell). They leave behind a robust Fermi liquid on-shell. A single half filled band crossing the Fermi level provides a number of special k-space regions for singlet stabilizing umklapp pair scattering and superconductivity stabilizing repulsive pair scattering. Carefully designed perturbations could deconfine a confined superconductivity. We suggest that electron transfer (doping) from Ag nanoparticles to Au matrix (with a higher electronegativity), quasi 2D structural reconstructions (e.g., 9R structure), electronically decoupled 2D patches and 1D segments expose confined superconductivity. Beneath a calm Fermi sea, strong supercurrents may exist in several metals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".