MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887539911 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-3889

Abstract 3889: <i>RPL28</i> promoter polymorphism rs4806668 is associated with reduced survival in FOLFIRI-treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients

2018· article· en· W2887539911 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adrien Labriet, Éric Lévesque, Elena De Mattia, Erika Cecchin, Derek J. Jonker, Félix Couture, David Simonyan, Angela Buonadonna, Mario D’Andrea, Giuseppe Toffoli, Chantal Guillemette

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOLFIRIIrinotecanColorectal cancerMedicineGenotypingInternal medicineOncologyHazard ratioGenotypeFolinic acidProportional hazards modelPopulationCancerBiologyGeneGeneticsConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is a standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our study aimed to investigate genetic variability in candidate genes in relation to patients' outcomes using two independent cohorts of 417 FOLFIRI-treated mCRC cases recruited in Canada and Italy. We used a haplotype-tagging polymorphism (htSNP) approach to maximize the coverage of genetic variability of the selected genes and genotyping was performed using time-of-flight mass spectrometry iPLEX Sequenom Technology. Associations between polymorphisms and clinical outcomes were tested using Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for covariates. Of the genes tested, RPL28 encodes a ribosomal protein and its silencing was shown to enhance sensitivity to 5-FU and irinotecan in vitro.1 RPL28 rs4806668G>T was associated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in the Canadian (hazard ratio (HR) 3.23, P = 0.013), Italian (HR 3.28, P = 0.021) and combined (HR 3.36, P < 0.001) cohorts. This marker was also associated with a reduced overall survival (OS) in the Canadian (HR 3.09, P = 0.032), Italian (HR 3.05, P = 0.030) and combined (HR 3.07, P = 0.002) cohorts. These carriers of the rs4806668 TT genotype associated with reduced survival represent less than 5% of the population of European ancestry and its frequency varies greatly among ethnic groups. This htSNP, located in the promoter region of RPL28, is in strong linkage disequilibrium with six other polymorphisms and may affect RPL28 gene expression. In support, the rs4806668T allele was associated with increased RPL28 expression in colon tissues of healthy individuals of the GTEx cohort, compared to rs4806668G carriers. Functional investigations are required to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism. These results suggest a role for the ribosomal RPL28 protein in cancer cell response to FOLFIRI treatment. This work is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 1Allen et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Jan;11(1):119-31 Citation Format: Adrien Labriet, Éric Lévesque, Elena De Mattia, Erika Cecchin, Derek Jonker, Félix Couture, David Simonyan, Angela Buonadonna, Mario D'Andrea, Lyne Villeneuve, Giuseppe Toffoli, Chantal Guillemette. RPL28 promoter polymorphism rs4806668 is associated with reduced survival in FOLFIRI-treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3889.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207